Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Learning from Balaam (and avoiding the easy jokes) part II

So last week I started talking about Balaam. From the story of Balaam, I pulled out three ideas that I believe to be true:
  1. It is possible to know who God is and worship Him wrong.
  2. It is possible to earnestly seek the Word of God and still disobey Him.
  3. It is possible for God to speak through you, even when you don't know what to say.
Last week's post was about the first point. Sometimes, in our zeal to please God (which is a righteous thing) we cling so strongly to our own idea of who God is and what He wants that we don't allow Him to change our minds and hearts so that we can actually SEE Him and show Him to those around us. We may know God - but we don't quite understand Him, sometimes. When our desire to be right beats out our desire to be righteous, we start to mess things up.

And that has a lot to do with our attitude towards the means through which God reaches us.

How is it that there are so many people in this world who can quote the Bible, chapter and verse, for hours on end... and yet have no idea what it actually means?

Isaac Asimov was a brilliant, brilliant, brilliant man. My goodness, was that guy smart. He was a professor of biochemistry at Boston University, was vice-president of Mensa, president of the American Humanist Association, and has published works in nine of the ten major categories of the Dewey Decimal System. If that isn't some nerd cred, I don't know what is.

Among his published works are some incredible pieces of science-fiction, as well as non-fiction, history, the three-volume set Understanding Physics, and his world-renowned guides to Shakespeare and the Bible. If you're a serious student of Shakespeare, you can't go without Asimov's Guide to Shakespeare. And if you're a serious student of the Bible... Well, yeah, Asimov's pretty tough to beat there, too.

The interesting thing is that Isaac Asimov was an atheist.

I would dare say that Isaac Asimov knew the Bible better than most people. Certainly better than me! You guys have no idea how much time I spend writing these entries just reading entire books of the Bible, trying to remember where that one verse was... about the thing... where God said something... to someone...

I wouldn't expect Asimov to have the same reaction to the Bible as I do. He didn't believe in it. He didn't believe in it before he wrote his Guide, and he didn't believe in it after he wrote his Guide, either.

But within Christianity... Yeah, OK, I'll admit I kinda expect people to have the at least a similar reaction to the Bible as my own. And that reaction is an understanding that my own understanding is entirely secondary to the wisdom and truth contained within the Word of God.

Let us consider, for a moment, sex. Sex is kind of a big deal. I understand it's pretty fantastic. There is, in fact, an entire book of the Bible that focuses pretty strongly on sex.

But God has made it clear through the Bible that sex is meant for - reserved for - marriage. One man, one woman, one relationship. That's the point.

But I've come in contact with this idea that sex outside of marriage is OK so long as you're not married - because then, well, obviously, you're not cheating on your spouse. How can you cheat on a spouse you don't have? Brilliant!

Except oh wait that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

You remember that verse that says "God cannot be mocked"? This counts as mocking God. God doesn't have loopholes. You're not gonna pull a fast one on ol' God.
God is not a man that He should lie,
nor a son of man, that He should change His mind.
Does He speak and then not act?
Does He promise and not fulfill?
- Numbers 23:19

That little tidbit comes from Balaam's second oracle- the blessing he poured out on Israel in his second attempt to curse them. Earlier - like, 11 verses earlier - God said through Balaam, "How can I curse those whom God has not cursed?" And yet Balaam insists on cursing those whom God has not cursed, whom God has specifically told Balaam not to curse.

And sometimes we insist on our own understanding, as well, even though God is right in front of us, screaming in our ears, telling us that we're missing the picture.

Let's go back to sex (since it's such an interesting topic): how did Jesus deal with people whose sins were of a sexual nature?
But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"

"No one, sir," she said.
"Then neither do I condemn you," Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin."
- John 8:1-11

So that's Jesus. And there are other examples worth considering - the Samaritan woman at the well, for starters, plus the "sinful" woman who wiped Jesus' feet with her hair.

But what about us?

How do we deal with people - especially women - when we find out they've made mistakes of a sexual nature?

Do we smile with tears in our eyes and embrace them with the love of Jesus Christ and His church, and tell them that God will forgive their sins, just as He forgave our own sins?

Or do we look down on them? Do we call them names? Do we heap scorn and rejection on them, ostracize them from the family of God, and then have the audacity to tell them that they earned the reputation they now carry?

May God have mercy on you and comfort you if you wind up pregnant outside of marriage in most of the churches I have known in my life, because the people that God has called to be the ones who show you mercy and comfort certainly aren't going to be the ones to do it.

And we don't just do that with sex. Yeah, we blow sexual sins WAY out of proportion (lying is just as much of a sin as anything sexual [Revelation 21:8, look it up], but you don't see radical protest groups at military funerals with signs that read "GOD HATES POLITICIANS," do you?), but they're not the only thing people completely lose their minds over.

Sin is bad. I get it.

But you know what beats sin, every time? Grace. Truth. Mercy. Love.

Yelling does not make sin go away. Changing the Constitution does not make sin go away. Bombing does not make sin go away.

Christ makes sin go away.

And I meet so many people - so, so, so many people! - who say that they "love the sinner, hate the sin..." And I can't say that they don't. But I think I can say that their distinction between sinner/sin might be a little blurry.

And I think that problem comes from a misunderstanding of the Bible on a fundamental level.

Before I go any further... No, I don't have a Bible degree. No, I can't read Greek, Hebrew, or Aramaic. No, I can't really tell you a lot about the Elohist/Jahwist sources in the Old Testament or the "Q" source for the New Testament. I realize that all of those are important things, and if I am seeing further, it is only because I am standing on the shoulders of people who had better luck with Machen than I did.

But I don't for a second believe that the Bible is an incomprehensible text that only the highly-educated few can ever hope to even begin to understand, and I very much doubt that any of you reading this believe that, either.

And yet, far too often, we live our lives with this sort of fear of the Bible. There are things we don't understand and questions we don't have answers to that the Bible is painfully silent over. And so, in our attempts to seize righteousness, we do exactly what we've been told not to do - we make the Bible a list of rules. We make the Bible the ultimate truth of the universe. We make the Bible the focus.

Folks - I love the Bible. But I do not follow the Bible. I follow Christ. The Bible is not God. It is about God. It is not the ultimate expression of the Will of God. God's Will is the ultimate expression of itself. The Bible is not the only way God speaks to us in today's world - it's just the only one that all of us can read at the same time.

I want to make sure that this is clearly understood. I do believe, fully, that "All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work." (II Timothy 3:16-17)

But I also believe that there are still plenty of "ignorant and unstable people" who "distort... the Scriptures... to their own destruction." (II Peter 3:16)

It has become painfully obvious to me that a knowledge of the Bible is not enough. After all, Satan, tempting Christ in the wilderness, quoted Scripture. (I fully realize that it's just as possible for me to be Satan quoting Scripture here as anything, but bear with me, I promise I have a point that's actually backed by Scripture.)

Let us consider a few things.
Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head.
- I Corinthians 11:4

So, guys, you take off your hat when you pray, right? When I went to Uplift with the Heritage Place youth group last summer, I saw way, way, waaaaaaaaay too many youth ministers who didn't. Is that just a Southern thing? Or is that a God thing? I mean, it is pretty plainly stated in the Bible, isn't it? And then right after that...
And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is just as though her head were shaved. If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head.
- I Corinthians 11:5-6

So, ladies... How many of you still cover your heads when you pray? How many of you are rockin' a short haircut? How do you feel about your relationship with God? Is it tied into the length of your hair, or is it something a bit more internal than that? And then there's...
I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God.
- I Timothy 2:9-10

So braided hair is sinful? Oh, man. My sister is going to hell. Especially from Kindergarten to 6th grade. Gold? Pearls? Expensive clothes? Apparently Paul's got it out for my Grandmother, too!

Or maybe... Maybe maybe maybe...

Just maybe...

Maybe we should consider that the Bible is not written to us.

It is written for us, but it is not written to us. It is written to people who lived, ate, drank, worked, slept, married, worshiped and died some 18-19 centuries before we were even born. It's a product of a culture that we don't live in - that we can't live in!

Whether we like it or not, the world has changed since the time of Christ. The message written to a church in Corinth in the latter half of the first century is not the message for the church in the United States at the dawn of the 21st century. Can we learn from their message? Absolutely! Does it contain truth? Undoubtedly! Is it the ultimate truth?

No!

God is the ultimate truth!

The Bible is God's letter to us, and it's all about Him. In its pages, God reveals to us portions of His nature so that we can know what we're pursuing. He shares with us select stories of His works in the world so we can look around us now and see His hands in every aspect of our lives. He tells us about His Son so we can encounter holiness. He tells us about His Spirit - the Spirit which now lives in all who accept Christ! The same Spirit that inspired the Scriptures! The same Spirit that healed the sick, raised the dead, and spread the Gospel throughout the Roman world!

He tells us about His Spirit because He gave it to us!

The Bible is what the Bible is. It's probably not going to change any time soon. That doesn't discount a word in it! It just means that we've got to start following the Voice that is dynamic, actively working, and speaks to us in our lives! Speaks to us in our settings! Speaks to us, as individuals, in our own hearts, minds, and souls!

The Holy Spirit is here! It is now! It is forever!

The Bible is a book. It can be destroyed.

The Holy Spirit is the eternal Spirit of God, placed inside every one of us when we take on Christ in baptism. Our souls become intertwined with the very Soul of God, leading us into further understanding of God's Word, yes, but also of God's Will.

The Bible contains God's Will in the grand sweeping arcs. And that's an absolutely indispensable guide for living the life we're called to live.

But when it comes down to the details? When it comes down to the hard decisions that just aren't covered in the Bible? When it comes down to seeing what God has in store for us, here, 2000 years removed from the final Amen of Revelation?

I think God is still talking to me. I've just got to be willing to listen.

And that's where next week's entry comes in (if I still have any readers by then).

4 comments:

  1. Haven't had time to keep up with all of these, but I read this one. You, sir, talk a lot of sense.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent thought on the truth that the Word of God must be more than a static understanding of words on a page. A knowledge of God without a parallel life of faith according to that knowledge is dead - and is even worse than ignorance of God. To know is not necessarily to obey at all!

    Will you allow me to take a slightly contrary position on the pertinence of God's Word? I've never encountered a hard decision in which the bible was not extremely pertinent. 2000 years after its last addition, the Word of God remains orders of magnitude above any other writing or set of writings with regard to its pertinence to people's lives and character and search for godliness: period. Truly it is "living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart."

    And I think we are sometimes too quick to dismiss and cast aside details of biblical instructions. Given that Mosaic Law contains more than 600 very specific laws and that the new covenant in Christ has very very few details, I am convinced that those details take on more importance and weight, not less. Let me share what I consider to be one of the most important elements of our approach to modern application of scriptural teachings:
    We must be very careful and diligent to first understand the mind of the author: that is, the original point being made by a N.T. author to his original audience in THEIR specific context. ONLY then are we in a position to responsibly draw an appropriate modern application. Further, if we determine a modern meaning that could NOT have been a possible intended meaning for the original audience, then this we are probably using the text to support a bias. Such treatment of it is generally irresponsible and dangerous. We all know conservative and liberal people who use the text in this manner.

    With this thought, let me ask 3 questions of the text in I Corinthians 11:1-17, which you use as an example above.

    Is Paul making a point with the instructions he gives or is he merely mentioning a cultural detail?

    Is it important to know that Paul has just finished giving instruction regarding the path to escape from temptation vs the path to self-seeking, and that he is here addressing reverence in the context of direct communication with God with respect to authority, humility, and honor/shame?

    If Paul is in fact giving a blunt instruction to Greek women who do not want to hear it, then what are we to make of the principle(s) he is teaching in what he calls "this instruction"?

    I have met very few people who have thoughtfully studied the mind of the author in this passage so that they can explain what the principle is - what's behind the instruction - why the woman is to cover her head. They usually only know the ancillary effects mentioned. And yet knowing the principle, knowing WHY is key!

    Alas, impersonal monologues are so difficult. Thanks for the encouragement to make sure we know God rather than just know His Word, which is rare enough as it is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mr. Cavender - I'm fine with your position, but I don't think it's contrary. In fact, I think it's more corollary to my point than anything.

    If we are able to find application for a text written on the other side of the planet in three different languages in a pre-industrial setting into our lives today, how can we attribute that to anything other than the power of the Holy Spirit working in our lives? The text itself is powerful, to be sure, but the Spirit itself is the more powerful force, as it is the Spirit of God Himself made manifest in our lives today, allowing us to interpret His Will for us, not only through the Scripture, but also through the gift of divine intervention into our very hearts, minds, and souls.

    As for your questions... Sure, Paul's making a point. And yes, it's important to understand the context. And yes, he's giving a blunt instruction to Greek women.

    But that still means that he's making a point, within a context of addressing one's attitude towards God as it parallels to one's abilities to escape sin, to Greek women nearly 2,000 years ago.

    I believe that the principle we are to take from this instruction is not one of where men and women fall in the pecking order from God. I believe that's a very cultural thing, one that our culture has moved away from. And I don't really think that's bad. After all, in Galatians 3:28, Paul says that we are all one in Jesus, "neither male nor female."

    The principle as I see it is not that women should be submissive because God likes men better, but rather that we should all be submissive to each other, serving each other in Love, humbling ourselves in the sight of God and Humanity alike, and taking on the role of Christ Himself as He washed the feet of the disciples.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I didn't read the other comments because I don't have a ton of time right now, so my comment may repeat something already said. If that's the case, I'm sorry.

    Ok, I absolutely agree with you that God still moves in us a guides us today, and we need to follow His Voice in our lives. However, how do we know when we are hearing His Voice? I don't know about you, but I've never heard a deep, resounding voice call to me during a prayer. So what does it look like or feel like to hear His Voice? Is it just different for all people? Quite honestly, I don't like that thought. I don't like the idea that God's will is not necessarily concrete or quantitative. I don't feel easy thinking that someone may hear God and I don't and because of that they know God's will better than I. What if they just had heartburn from the burrito they ate at lunch and misinterpreted that as God's Voice speaking to them and moving in them? What if I get emotional during a quiet time with God and decide it is His Voice but really it's not, I'm just emotional? I guess what I want to know is how can I tell for sure what God's Voice is, and how can I trust others when they say they've heard God's will?

    ReplyDelete